Difference between revisions of "Talk:Software Development Procedure"

This Wiki is read-only for reference purposes to avoid broken links.

Revision as of 01:06, 18 November 2010

do we need to revise the best practices
- Tobi 08:06, 18 November 2010 (UTC) Here is my opinion
  1. I don't think that the best practices should be written in stone (im am bit sceptical about the "100% compliance" thing, too). It should be up to the PMC teams to interpret and revise them as neccessary.
  2. Therefore I don't think that the ABP need a resivion before this whole thing can start. They are already pretty good to help both the developers in writing good code and the PMC team to do a good review.
provide templates and samples for wiki pages

Here is the list of people working on the concept and agreeing with it:

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==open questions by nwessel==
 * do we need to revise the best practices
+** [[User:Tobi|Tobi]] 08:06, 18 November 2010 (UTC) Here is my opinion
+**#I don't think that the best practices should be written in stone (im am bit sceptical about the "100% compliance" thing, too). It should be up to the PMC teams to interpret and revise them as neccessary.
+**#Therefore I don't think that the ABP need a resivion before this whole thing can start. They are already pretty good to help both the developers in writing good code and the PMC team to do a good review.
 * provide templates and samples for wiki pages